Suicide is a severe public well being situation which has devastating impacts on households, pals and communities. Annually, 720,000 individuals die by suicide worldwide (World Well being Group, 2024). Suicide is the third main reason behind dying in 15-29-year-olds, though estimates range by nation (World Well being Group, 2024). Charges of suicide are notably excessive amongst males and in young people who experience discrimination and marginalisation together with refugees, First Nations individuals, incarcerated youth, and people from the LGBTQIA+ group (World Well being Group, 2024).
But suicide can be preventable. Creating evidence-informed prevention and early intervention strategies is vital to decreasing the variety of lives misplaced to suicide.
Welty and colleagues (2024) spotlight that present preventive interventions for suicide amongst adolescents are likely to deal with particular person threat elements (e.g., despair) which might fail to help adolescents who current as low-to-moderate threat, however are literally at the next threat of suicide. In addition they be aware that current approaches are sometimes costly and have restricted proof and effectiveness in decreasing suicide deaths. They counsel that an method that targets community-level protecting elements, particularly a way of connection to others, and takes a socio-ecological method (i.e., connections between people but additionally connection inside wider methods resembling household, college and group) is a crucial, but under-researched space in adolescent suicide prevention.
To this finish, Welty and colleagues (2024) focussed their systematic evaluate on “college connectedness” as a doubtlessly modifiable protecting issue for suicidality (i.e., ideas, plans, makes an attempt). College connectedness refers to ideas, emotions and behaviours related to connection to the varsity surroundings (e.g., college students feeling a way of belonging at college), relationships throughout the college (e.g., college students feeling that academics care about them) and studying experiences (e.g., scholar having fun with collaborating in studying duties; Hodges et al., 2018; García-Moya et al. 2019). Proof reveals that faculty connectedness is related to higher wellbeing, psychological well being, bodily and sexual well being, and academic outcomes, and that it may help protect adolescents against depression and anxiety (Aldridge & McChesney, 2018; Raniti et al., 2022; Rose et al., 2024; Wang & Degol, 2016).
Of their systematic evaluate, Welty and colleagues (2024) examined whether or not college connectedness protects towards suicidality in highschool college students and in that case, whether or not this relationship is modified by any of the next recognized threat elements for suicide in adolescents: despair, anxiousness, impulsivity, sleep, non-vaped substance use, vaping, gender, ethnicity, or age.
May a sense of reference to college scale back or stop suicide in adolescents?
Strategies
The authors searched the PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO on-line databases in December 2021 for observational (i.e., cohort; case management; cross-sectional) and experimental research inspecting the impact of faculty connectedness (i.e., publicity) on no less than one facet suicidality (i.e., end result) in highschool college students. Research wanted to be revealed in English and measure no less than one facet of faculty connectedness (i.e., social affiliations; college belonging; angle about college significance; supportive studying surroundings). There have been no restrictions by publication date.
Customary procedures for conducting a scientific evaluate had been adopted (e.g., screening of no less than 50% of articles by two reviewers; extracting knowledge utilizing predetermined classes). Included research had been assessed for threat of bias utilizing the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for nonrandomized research. Outcomes had been introduced utilizing narrative synthesis.
Outcomes
Research traits
Of the 871 articles that had been recognized, 34 met the inclusion standards. Twenty-seven research had been cross-sectional and 7 had been longitudinal. There have been no experimental/intervention research. Most research assessed suicidal ideation (30 research), adopted by plans (2 research), and makes an attempt (22 research). Twenty research assessed suicidality throughout the previous yr and solely 5 research assessed lifetime suicidality. Nearly all of research had been revealed in high-income international locations, primarily the US of America.
The standard of the included research was blended. Whereas 14 had been rated as “excessive” high quality (representing a low threat of bias), 20 had been thought of to have a “excessive” threat of bias (none had been rated as “very excessive” threat). The authors famous that increased threat of bias was ceaselessly related to research utilizing self-report outcomes and never justifying pattern dimension, for instance. The evaluate additionally discovered that research didn’t management for confounders resembling sleep, impulsivity, substance use, or despair of their statistical fashions.
Important findings
Findings regarding the impact of faculty connectedness on suicidality had been blended and trusted the result of curiosity:
- In research that examined suicidal ideation as an end result, 73% discovered that faculty connectedness protected towards suicidal ideation
- In research that examined suicide makes an attempt as an end result, 50% discovered that faculty connectedness protected towards suicide makes an attempt
- Of the 20 research revealed throughout the previous 5 years, 11 (55%) discovered that faculty connectedness was protecting towards suicidality
- No research examined moderators of faculty connectedness and suicidality.
College connectedness was linked to much less suicidal ideation in highschool college students.
Conclusions
This evaluate examined the consequences of faculty connectedness via a narrative synthesis of 34 revealed research.
General, the authors concluded that whereas college connectedness can assist defend towards suicidality, it’s extra protecting of suicidal ideation than suicide makes an attempt.
To elucidate this discovering, the authors drew on the Interpersonal Concept of Suicide, which means that “belongingness and burdensomeness result in passive suicidal ideation” however “precise suicide makes an attempt require acquired functionality for suicide”. They proposed that whereas a scarcity college of connectedness is conceptually linked to a scarcity of belonging, it’s unlikely to affect an acquired functionality for suicide. Because of this whereas college connectedness and a way of belonging could assist scale back suicidal ideation, it’s much less more likely to affect suicide makes an attempt.
College methods play an necessary function in suicide prevention for adolescents.
Strengths and limitations
There are a number of strengths of this evaluate. First, by making use of a holistic, socio-ecological lens to prevention and early intervention of suicidality in adolescents, the examine expands upon current proof for individualised threat and protecting elements (e.g., poor sleep) to incorporate the affect of the broader methods wherein adolescents dwell, study, and develop (e.g., colleges). That is necessary as a result of we all know that threat elements for suicide are advanced and embrace particular person dangers (e.g. earlier suicide try or experiencing a psychological dysfunction) and people related to wider social determinants resembling publicity to antagonistic life occasions (e.g., abuse, disasters) and social or cultural drawback (Beautrais, 2000).
Moreover, this examine took an inclusive method to article looking out by utilizing a broad definition of faculty connectedness and never having restrictions by publication date. This means a big proportion of the out there research inspecting the impact of faculty connectedness and suicidality revealed in English have been captured on this systematic evaluate.
The authors acknowledge some limitations of the proof on this evaluate together with the observational nature of included research, most of which had been cross-sectional in design, which limits any inferences about causality (which requires potential knowledge). Moreover, solely research revealed in English had been included within the evaluate and all however one of many included research (which was from Vietnam) was performed in a high-income nation. This limits the generalisability of the findings to low- and middle-income countries the place the vast majority of suicides throughout the lifespan happen (World Well being Group, 2024).
We additionally be aware some issues. This evaluate included research performed with highschool college students, however the ages of included contributors weren’t reported. “Highschool” corresponds to completely different ages worldwide, which implies we can not decide the representativeness of the findings for youthful versus older adolescents. As well as, the evaluate included seven longitudinal research, however it’s unclear whether or not these used retrospective or potential knowledge. Moreover, no impact sizes had been reported, which is necessary data for figuring out the energy of the present proof base. Lastly, the authors acknowledge {that a} earlier systematic evaluate and meta-analysis was performed on the identical matter in 2017 (Marraccini and Brier, 2017). Whereas the present evaluate improves on some facets of the 2017 evaluate resembling strengthening the theoretical foundation and inspecting extra covariates, it’s unclear why a meta-analysis was not carried out.
We’d like extra potential knowledge and research from low- and middle-income international locations inspecting the impact of faculty connectedness on suicidality
Implications for apply
- The findings of this evaluate reinforce the significance of faculty socio-emotional environments in supporting scholar wellbeing.
- If supported by potential proof together with intervention research, enhancing college connectedness has the potential to cut back suicidal ideation in adolescents.
- Given that faculty connectedness has been related to psychological and bodily well being, wellbeing, and higher training outcomes in adolescents in different research, methods that enhance college connectedness (e.g., teacher-student help together with feeling that academics are truthful, empathic and supportive; Allen et al., 2018) could also be a very good funding for colleges to handle a number of scholar points concurrently. For instance, an intervention to enhance college connectedness would possibly enhance each psychological and bodily well being which reduces the necessity to implement interventions that concentrate on psychological and bodily well being individually.
Fostering a supportive and inclusive social-emotional surroundings in colleges is necessary for scholar wellbeing.
Assertion of pursuits
Dr Monika Raniti and Dr Jennifer Dam weren’t concerned within the Welty et al. (2024) evaluate or in any of the included research. Each Dr Raniti and Dr Dam are supported by the Centre of Analysis Excellence in Driving International Funding in Adolescent Well being (NHMRC GNT1171981). Dr Monika Raniti can be supported by the ALIVE Nationwide Centre for Psychological Well being Analysis Translation (NHMRC Particular Initiative in Psychological Well being Grant GNT2002047) and has beforehand acquired funding from the Wellcome Belief as a part of their Lively Components for Youth Anxiousness and Melancholy Fee (2021) to look at the function of faculty connectedness in youth despair and anxiousness.
Hyperlinks
Major paper
Welty CW, Bingham L, Morales M, Gerald LB, Ellingson KD, & Haynes PL. (2024). School connectedness and suicide among high school youth: a systematic review. Journal of College Well being. 2024;94(5):469-480. doi: 10.1111/josh.13445
Different references
Aldridge JM, McChesney Ok. The relationships between school climate and adolescent mental health and wellbeing: A systematic literature review. Worldwide Journal of Schooling Analysis. 2018;88:121–45.
Allen Ok, Kern ML, Vella-Brodrick D, Hattie J, Waters L. What schools need to know about fostering school belonging: A meta-analysis. Academic psychology evaluate. 2018;30:1-34.
Australian Institute for Well being and Welfare. (2023). Deaths by suicide among young people.
Barrass, L. (2024). Risk and recovery factors in male suicide: is society failing men? The Psychological Elf, January 2024.
Beautrais, A. L. Risk factors for suicide and attempted suicide among young people. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry. 2000;34(3):420-436.
García-Moya I, Bunn F, Jiménez-Iglesias A, Paniagua C, Brooks FM. The conceptualisation of school and teacher connectedness in adolescent research: a scoping review of literature. Academic Evaluate. 2019;71(4):423-444.
Hodges A, Cordier R, Joosten A, Bourke-Taylor H, Speyer R. Evaluating the psychometric quality of school connectedness measures: A systematic review. PloS one. 2018;13(9):e0203373.
Lawson, Ok. (2024). Suicide prevention: expanding the narrative to preventing the crisis, not just treating the crisis. The Psychological Elf, November 2024.
Mackay, L. (2023). Sexual minorities, suicide and self-harm: new research in England deepens our understanding. The Psychological Elf, September 2023.
Marraccini ME, Brier ZM. School connectedness and suicidal thoughts and behaviors: A systematic meta-analysis. College psychology quarterly. 2017;32(1):5.
Raniti, M. & Rakesh, D. (2022). School connectedness, anxiety and depression: recent evidence and young people’s perspectives #ActiveIngredientsMH. The Psychological Elf, February 2022.
Raniti M, Rakesh D, Patton GC, Sawyer SM. The role of school connectedness in the prevention of youth depression and anxiety: a systematic review with youth consultation. BMC Public Well being. 2022; 25;22(1):2152.
Roberts, T. (2019). Suicide and mental illness in low- and middle-income countries. The Psychological Elf, October 2019.
Rose ID, Lesesne CA, Solar J, Johns MM, Zhang X, Hertz M. The relationship of school connectedness to adolescents’ engagement in co-occurring health risks: A meta-analytic review. The Journal of College Nursing. 2024;40(1):58-73.
Suicide Prevention Australia. (2021). Fact sheet: Youth Suicide. 2021.
Wang M-T, Degol JL. School climate: A review of the construct, measurement, and impact on student outcomes. Academic Psychology Evaluate. 2016;28(2):315–52.
World Well being Group. (2024, August 29). Suicide.
