Dr. Day is skeptical: “I have never seen nice revealed information on [the benefits of PRF for skin,],” she says. “I don’t [offer PRF] for the pores and skin, as a result of I have been following [its use] in Europe for many years and I have never seen a lot profit. I’ve seen folks sad with the outcomes, and even individuals who have scarring from it. I actually discuss folks out of it.”
And also you may not need PRF for plumping up your nasal labial folds: “PRF is being bought as filler, however I do not assume it really works like filler,” says Dr. Day.
So why are extra folks excited by PRF? There’s a newness issue, for certain. There’s a consolation issue (whether or not or not it’s warranted), in one thing that’s derived from your individual physique. After which there’s this: Extra “sufferers are searching for options to filler,” says Ava Shamban, MD, a board-certified dermatologist in Beverly Hills and Santa Monica, who provides PRF remedies in her personal follow. We’re residing in a time of “filler fatigue”—fueled by sufferers who “expertise sagging, heaviness, or stretched-out tissues from overfilling and improper strategies [like poor] product placement,” says Dr. Shamban. However regardless of all of the discuss of filler fatigue, we’re additionally getting extra injectables—fillers had been up 4 % in 2023, as in comparison with 2022, in keeping with the American Society of Plastic Surgeons’ survey and trend report. We need to look younger. However we don’t need to look stuffed. That makes “a extra ‘pure’ product for pores and skin revitalization and rejuvenation” a tempting proposition, says Dr. Shamban. She is extra optimistic about PRF’s potential, however agrees with Dr. Day that it’s not an alternative choice to hyaluronic acid filler, as a result of it doesn’t have the identical energy or volumizing talents, and it breaks down sooner. Nonetheless, she sees a world by which it’s attainable PRF may very well be mixed with filler. It may very well be a useful software for particular sufferers—“as suppliers, we’ve got an unlimited array of merchandise, however it’s about 25% the merchandise chosen and 75% strategies and injection model that make a distinction,” says Dr. Shamban.
What does the FDA need to say about utilizing a affected person’s blood to probably regenerate their pores and skin? In accordance with Dr. Shamban, the FDA views PRP and PRF equally to a tissue switch. “They’re frightened about contamination, like if [the blood] is badly processed,” she explains, including that the recognition of PRF and PRP remedies at medspas versus board-certified dermatologists means there may probably be a mix-up of affected person samples. For reference, a New Mexico spa got here below hearth after three folks had been contaminated with HIV after receiving PRP facials. The FDA has issued a warning letter towards regenerative drugs merchandise that embody stem cells. Within the letter, the FDA cautions, “There may be a variety of deceptive info on the web about these merchandise, together with statements in regards to the situations they can be utilized to deal with. FDA is anxious that many sufferers in search of cures and cures could also be misled by details about merchandise which can be illegally marketed, haven’t been proven to be secure or efficient, and, in some instances, might have vital questions of safety that put sufferers in danger.” We reached out to the FDA to ask if PRF injections could be included on this warning, and at press time, had not acquired affirmation.
To learn extra injectable information:
